Today, the Senate backed away from their bill amendment to add some Congressional oversight to these Czars because the Whitehouse pressured them to kill the bill. The proposed amendment was in an Interior Department environmental appropriations bill on the Senate floor, proposed by Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who sought to simply restrict federal funds for the expenses of White House-appointed czars unless these two conditions were met:
- Every czar would respond to “reasonable requests” to testify before Congress on matters related to the office.
- White House-appointed czars are required to issue a report to Congress twice a year.
It’s tough to comment on this because we need all President’s to have presidential powers so that they can accomplish their ever ambitious, especially if a congress is playing dirty pool while a President is trying openly and legitimately get some campaign promises accomplished. But out Constitution has checks and balances for a reason—they are President, not King for a reason. So I liked Senator Collin’s call for more transparency, and I don’t think she was overboard here with her requests, but I’m cautious with my support of this because I do not want Congress to have too much power either, especially during times where congress would be led by the opposing party to the President. Transparency and blue sky sunshine on all government is always a great preventative to most problems.
It gives a bad appearance for the Democratic Congress to fold sold easily like this and kill the ammendment this way simply because the Whitehouse pressured them; this looks bad and it didn’t need to be, the Whitehouse could have acknowledged that some transparency is needed and offer an alternative idea, that would have been better.
We need to see Congress require some standards that keep these Czars in legal check, especially regarding their job description and mission. I’m seeing too many extreme cases where the word diversity or green is used, but they seem more preoccupied with indoctrinating an progressive (socialist) ideology. It’s not right for the President to hire all this questionable staff without any accountability, so there needs to be some improvement here.
A Czar cannot be allowed to operate outside Article II Section 2 of the Constitution of the United States, which says, “and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.”
This long, single sentence says that the President nominates, but the Senate approves all of the senior leadership positions. In addition to Ambassadors and other positions specifically mentioned, examples of those not stated directly but legislated later would be: Homeland Security, IRS, CIA, FBI, NSA, and NASA, etc.
The President is allowed to hire advisors who will research and prepare a proposal to him. But when you envision an advisor, you would expect them leading a small team of researchers, statisticians, subject matter experts in their field, some writers and maybe some lawyers; and they would research things, attend or host some committee meeting with Congress, and then make recommendations to the President.
But my fear is that we have Czars who are doing something much different, and are embedding their ideology directly into our Bills through the use of Amendments. Time will prove my fears wrong or right—I hope that I’m wrong.
Glenn Beck of Fox News has received the largest single recognition for publically showing that many of the President’s Czars have radical idea compared to mainstream politics. He carefully and methodically quoted from each person directly using their own words, which were quite extreme and had roots in socialism (often called progressivism now), Marxism, and communism.
Beck was instrumental in raising awareness to Van Jones, who later resign his position after a massive public outcry immediately resulted.
Beck and many others, including myself, fearfully watch the FCC Chief Diversity Officer, Mark Lloyd because of his radical views, especially his whitepaper, “The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio”.
Thank you,
very interesting article
thank you, very interesting idea
Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts.Any way Ill be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon
This is a really good post, I discovered your web site doing research yahoo for a similar topic and came to this. I couldnt come across to much alternative details on this blog post, so it was nice to find this one. I will be back again to look at some other posts that you have another time.